Saturday 16 April 2016

IFS SLICE VOL 3


As we approach the nemesis known as exams, we also approach the end of the course and modules. The rush begins for the final submissions, as the coach would say "its crunch time"



Progress for the past week includes reflecting and refining skills on peer assessments; possibly a more challenging task than simple project initiation itself, and in just a moment I shall elaborate as to why exactly.  When presented with a particular task, be it individual or group, for me it's simply best to attack the project head on. Research, due diligence, consultation with lectures, liaising with peers etc.  However critiquing a fellow colleague's work, and being cognisant that the outcome has implications on both parties' marks posed a somewhat challenge. It is something that I do indeed have experience in, however, I am not accustomed to just yet. I am usually the individual concerned with performing the work at hand and having seniors assess it to their liking and level of acceptance. One can fully appreciate the skill development as many of us in IFS will undoubtedly become Project Managers. However this is an area in which my experience is finite in comparison to the rest of my skills.

Learning from the week include the Models below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TTF - Technology Task Fit

Technology task fit is the degree to which technology assists an individual in performing his/her portfolio of tasks.

More specifically the correspondence between task requirements individual abilities and functionality of the technology.

When technology provides features and support that fit the requirements of a task - information systems have a positive impact on performance when there is a correspondence between core functionality and task requirements

TTF - using  Broadband Adaptation  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAM - Technology Acceptance Model

The technology acceptance model (TAM) is an information systems theory that models how users come to accept and use a technology.
The model suggests that when users are presented with a new technology, a number of factors influence their decision about how and when they will use it.
  Perceived usefulness
  Perceived ease of use

TAM - using  Broadband Adaptation  




TTD -Theory of Technology dominance

TTD has two dependent factors:

  Reliance - The extent to which an individual applies the intelligent decision aid and integrates the recommendations of that aid into his or her judgment.

  Dominance - The state of decision making where the intelligent decision aid, as opposed to its user, takes primary control of a decision making process.

TTD has four independent factors:

  Task Experience - The level of experience a decision maker has regarding the completion of a task as well as the extent to which the decision maker has developed strategies for completing that particular task.

  Task Complexity - The extent to which the cognitive abilities of the decision maker are challenged with completing a certain task. (In psychology this is often termed Task Difficulty.)

  Decision Aid Familiarity - The extent to which the decision maker is comfortable with the intelligent decision aid based on prior experience and/or significant training with the aid (or similar aids).

  Cognitive Fit – The extent to which the cognitive processes used with the decision aid to complete a task match the cognitive processes normally applied by the decision maker using the aid.



My Skill Inventory to date include:



  §  Mentoring
  §  Coaching
  §  Reporting
  §  Business & Process Analysis
  §  Improving methodologies
  §  Training & Coaching methodology,
  §  Risk assessment
  §  Time management.
  §  Business and Data analysis
  §  Conflict management
  §  Interviewing
  §  Directing


Occupational goals remain unchanged and entail becoming a BA -Business Analyst
The plan to achieve this goal is to pass Honours (fairly well) then apply to UCT BASA program.
Obtain my Advanced Diploma in Business and System analysis, then either get placed in a company as part of the program or simply seek a company to work for that suits my persona. My intention is further my studies part time as I do wish to obtain a Masters in Information Systems



Goals for the years to come would include moving into a BA role, then later to Senior BA and from there Solutions System Architecture or DevOps. While I have certain milestones I wish to reach, I am open to simply enjoy the journey and do not wish to over-plan and would not mind ending up wherever the road takes me.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The moment were we part ways I am afraid, This chapter concludes the final in our trilogy
For what it’s worth , it’s never too late or in some cases, too early to be whoever you want to be. There’s no time limit, stop whenever you want. You can change or stay the same, there are no rules to this thing. We can make the best or the worst of it. I hope you make the best of it.
I hope you see things that startle you. I hope you feel things you never felt before. I hope you meet people with a different point of view. I hope you live a life you’re proud of, and If you find that you’re not. I hope you have the courage to start all over again.




Tuesday 5 April 2016

IFS SLICE VOL 2

"My senses begin to dim, I feel a loss of my strength, it is the heat of the battle, in the warriors code there is no surrender even though his body cries 'stop' his spirit cries 'never' deep in my soul a quiet ember"



Sleepless nights consume our daily lives; and if one does figure out that Parody then you have experienced IFS Postgrad."

Such has been the last 2 weeks dating the mistress known as Honours who consumes all my energy and time. A cool feeling of relief washes over my face after the Peer Review for IFS 731, as a bulk of the presentations I say farewell to.

To list but some of the adversity overcame in recent weeks were assignments for ever single module due in recent succession.
Having taking a break from the student life; and returning from the work environment to once again become a student I feel a slight evolutionary advantage, and if history has taught us anything - it is that evolution always wins.
My years in the work environment have enabled me to take charge of unprecedented situations and act as a leader to my team.

Looking back at it now and comparing our final presentations with first, I can truly say we have come a long way.


 
  1. Progress per week
Progress to date thus far includes Assignments and presentations on Agile, Project Management, Scrum, DevOps; every single concept once asked in past interviews if I had knowledge on.  

IFS 712 is complete in respect of assignments and presentations minus exam
IFS 713 is nearing completion minus exam as all that remains are a last few class discussions.
IFS 722 we have only recently received both our assignments one group and one individual research assignment in preparation for Honours; for those who wish to pursue
IFS 721 had to be placed on a brief hold while prioritization for deadlines of other modules take place. 

Despite the pandemonium among students our team moral has growth substantially and we have become more of a little family, not only slaving away for assignments but bringing each other breakfast in the morning, treats in evening to create a more positive and pleasant working environment.


  1. Lessons learnt & Interests.
I've learnt that Project management is hardly what it once was in terms of approach, development execution and overall methodology. Digital innovation is at the forefront, leaving companies looking for fresher and more adaptive methodologies to meet project requirements. Increasingly traditional approaches such as the hierarchical waterfall method take a back seat to burgeoning Agile and DevOps techniques. 

When it comes to project management, Agile should no longer be considered merely an option but rather a necessity. Agile allows the structure and sequence of open communication and collaboration between phases. Agile approaches introduce a faster and more adaptive management process, breaking down once- monolithic projects into quick-hitting sprints. The emphasis is placed on constant adaption, innovation, experimentation and feedback for constant improvement. Out of this we have Scrum and Lean; which are essentially mindsets/methodologies. They have different approaches and they work effectively in different situations. Scrum begins with the team while Lean begins with the process. Lean Software Development facilitates guidelines on a set of practices, while Scrum focuses itself to the framework of project management practices.


  1. Personality
Test 1 - Findings

INTJs -  Introversion Intuition Thinking Judging are analytical and most comfortable working alone and tend to be less sociable than other types.  Nevertheless, INTJs are prepared to lead if no one else seems up to the task, or if they see a major weakness in the current leadership. They tend to be pragmatic, logical, and creative. They have a low tolerance for spin or rampant emotionalism. They are not generally susceptible to catchphrases and do not recognize authority based on tradition, rank, or title. 

Test 2-  Findings


The Investigator. The perceptive, cerebral type. Alert, insightful, and curious. They are able to concentrate and focus on developing complex ideas and skills. Independent, innovative, and inventive, they can also become preoccupied with their thoughts and imaginary constructs. They become detached, yet high-strung and intense. They typically have problems with eccentricity, nihilism, and isolation. 
At their Best: visionary pioneers, often ahead of their time, and able to see the world in an entirely new way




The Enthusiast. The busy, productive type. Extroverted, optimistic, versatile, and spontaneous. Playful, high-spirited, and practical, they can also misapply their many talents, becoming overextended, scattered, and undisciplined. They constantly seek new and exciting experiences, but can become distracted and exhausted by staying on the go. They typically have problems with impatience and impulsiveness.
 At their Best: they focus their talents on worthwhile goals, becoming appreciative, joyous, and satisfied



In comparison to SWOT analysis I feel there was a glaring contradiction between my personality test and my personal SWOT; perhaps I am my own worst enemy or harshest critic. The personality test reveals more credit than I allow myself to have; which is fitting considering I am not an natural optimist.

I agree with the personality type to a level in which the personality tests highlight "individuals such as myself are most comfortable working alone and tend to be less sociable than other types"
At their Best: visionary pioneers, often ahead of their time, and able to see the world in an entirely new way

Insights gained from personality tests findings reveal that I could be both analytical and examine in detail and in-depth as well as approach matters from a holistic and overall view.


Additional comments and views

As one of the top performing students I have been fortunate enough to be selected to attend a conference in Germany on Digital Transformation of Higher education hosted through HNU -Hochshule Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences. While this is an amazing opportunity the application for the Visa has cause considerable anxiety with my ever strenuous schedule.